Sentence examples for more responding on from inspiring English sources

But why should summation of two Pavlovian CSs produce more responding on different trials?

In summary, standard configural theories cannot explain the results reported here, specifically the finding of more responding on same than on different trials in Experiments 1 and 3a.

If the occasion setter is not present, then Pavlovian processes will predominate – which in this procedure would produce the opposite pattern, more responding on different trials.

Thus, based on the similarity of our procedures to those employed by Watt and Honey, we might predict that Pavlovian summation should produce more responding on different trials in the present experiment.

This account makes no specific prediction about the pattern of results that will be obtained if no occasion setter is present, but instead appeals to the principles of Pavlovian summation – which, on the basis of prior work (Watt and Honey, 1997), we have taken to predict more responding on different trials.

Without extra assumptions, such an account must therefore always predict more responding on same than on different trials regardless of whether the occasion setter is present or not – although it can explain lack of an effect in terms of reduced sensitivity.

As A and B are equally associated with reinforcement and nonreinforcement, as are x and y, Pavlovian conditioning could not predict more responding to x on reinforced A… x+ trials than on nonreinforced B… x− trials, and so could not explain accurate performance on this task.

In differentiated keratinocytes, the silencing of the 3 more responding miRNAs had no effects on immediate cell viability: this suggests that the miRNAs responding to IR in differentiated keratinocytes are not directly involved in immediate cell survival.

A recent study in the HAP and LAP selected mouse lines found that the HAP mice showed more impulsive responding on a delay-discounting task than did the LAP mice or the progenitor strain (Oberlin and Grahame 2009).

In this incongruent condition, healthy participants are slower and more error prone in responding on the second selection event relative to a control condition in which no numbers are repeated.

Pretreatment synovial biopsies showed significantly more synovial macrophages in patients responding on IAGC.