A common standard of how clinical trials are performed and how their results are presented would make the process of systematic review more reliable and less laborous [ 15].
The investigated tools combine modelling based on first engineering principles and data based modelling into a modelling cycle that facilitates use of statistical methods with the aim of synthesizing more reliable models for prediction in a systematic way.
(2013a, 2015) when generating M clusterings corresponding to M runs of the K-means algorithm and then choosing the one with the optimal Ncut, a further systematic mechanism could be more reliable.
A review (admittedly not a systematic one, which would be more reliable, since it would tell you how the studies included in the review were chosen) of cocoa and cardiovascular health in the journal Circulation suggests that epicatechin, a specific flavanol, may have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects that protect the inner walls of blood vessels from atherosclerosis.
59 60 Second, quantification of absolute metabolite values is complex, so the metabolite ratios to creatine are much more reliable than the absolute levels, as they can minimise systematic errors.
With the development of built-in scanning probe microscopy imaging capabilities such as atomic force microscopy and indentation tip scanning probe microscopy, last-generation indentation devices have made systematic residual imprint imaging much faster and more reliable.
A quantitative systematic review was performed in order to provide more reliable estimates of the incidence of re-occurring PONV/vomiting after placebo and to help investigators defining a clinically relevant treatment effect.
In particular, individual patient data meta-analyses are considered to be an ideal standard of systematic review as they have been shown to produce more reliable results.
In this context at least, therefore, prediction based on the systematic assessment of symptom burden is potentially valuable, being more reliable than ordinary clinical judgment.
Errors in differences calculated by the same method (be that method accurate or not) will always be more reliable (within the limits of the method) as one would expect many systematic errors to cancel.
