Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Assessments of the "more reliable" subset of ESTs revealed significant over expression in hippocampus and whole brain (corrected p ca 0.01 for each).
In order to find better source PPIs for predicting interologs, a more reliable subset of the experimental PPIs in STRING has been chosen in this experiment.
In any study that uses reporters in the three intermediate categories and reports either genome-wide or chromosome-wide results, the analysis should be repeated with the fully valid reporters only to verify that this more reliable subset provides qualitatively identical results.
Similar(57)
In the case of the more reliable subsets of phosphoserines observed in several experiments, the subtitution rate to aspartate and glutamate is even higher, and also lies outside the interval of bootstraps that in this case is wider, as the sample size is smaller.
These prioritized layers are transmitted in an UEP fashion, sending in a more reliable way more important subsets.
For example, do some Y-STRs lead to more reliable estimates than others [8], and can a subset of the most useful ones be identified?
This has been repeated by using each subset as the test set to obtain more reliable results.
The same is true of the H37Rv STRING PPI dataset as a whole, though a subset comprising PPIs with score ≥ 700 seems more reliable.
We have identified four subsets of this B2H PPI dataset that are more reliable, which can be combined into a single dataset, which can serve as a suitable reference H37Rv physical interaction dataset for many applications.
However, the study also indicated that a subset of this dataset (with combined score ≥ 770) is more reliable with greater portion of it having correlated gene expression profiles and coherent informative Gene Ontology (GO) term annotations in both interaction partners.
In the process, we find four subsets of the B2H PPI dataset that may be more reliable than the rest of this dataset.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com