Sentence examples for more relatedness from inspiring English sources

The odds of sharing more segments as well as longer segments were higher in population with more relatedness, as expected.

This is because more relatedness creates more variation between groups, which results in groups with below or above average susceptibility and/or infectivity.

Using pedigree information reduced the computation time in the larger datasets, which had more relatedness amongst the genotyped individuals, because both relatedness and large data set size cause more surrogate parents (Table 3).

Conversely, while the genetic parameters estimated from pond-reared fish may be less representative of those in the wild population (Roff, 1997, 2002), this approach does ensure that a sample will contain more relatedness structure, and (since parents and offspring are know to be sampled, almost completely) also provides a far more tractable problem for the pedigree estimation from molecular data.

To overcome this difficulty, a strategy to identify genetically homogenous subsets of CRC based on data stored in the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR) and linked to population genealogy records from the Utah Population Database (UPDB) was devised to identify subsets of CRC cases showing significantly more relatedness than expected for all CRC cases.

The accepted genotypic method for defining species is based on overall genomic relatedness, such that strains which share approximately 70% or more relatedness using DNA-DNA hybridization, with 5°C or less Δ Tm (the difference in the melting temperature between homologous and heterologous hybrids), under standard conditions, are considered to be members of the same species [ 9].

Long ROH are evidence of recent shared ancestry, while short ROH typically reflect more ancient relatedness [ 30].

However, a greater diversity of STs and more complicated relatedness between the results of PFGE and MLST were observed in RNKP, indicating more diverse genetic backgrounds in RNKP.

Thirty markers seems to be sufficient to identify PO's or FS's, but fails to separate HS's or more distant relatedness categories unequivocally.

Also, because the data were collected from a captive hatchery strain, it was possible that more cryptic relatedness between families could yield false positive associations.

Here, we review factors that predict food sharing in vampire bats based on previously published and unpublished data, validate previous published results with more precise relatedness estimates, and describe current evidence for and against alternative explanations for its evolutionary stability.