The phrase "more properly considered" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to express that a certain thing should be seen from a different perspective, or as something else than what it appears to be. For example: "The difficulties faced in the project are more properly considered to be opportunities."
Tonsillitis (acute infection of the tonsils) is more properly considered a part of the acute-pharyngitis (throat-inflammation) syndrome.
It came to be regarded as an appendix to Luther's Schmalkaldic Articles, although later research established that it is more properly considered an extension of the Augsburg Confession.
As it happens, this exhibition's best painting is a picture of a woman and child by Mary Cassatt, who may be more properly considered a French Impressionist given her nearly lifelong stay in France and her intimate associations with Degas and other original members of the movement.
The phenomenon is often referred to as stress corrosion cracking (SCC) but as will be discussed is more properly considered as CF. Existing CF (SCC) models predict a service life of more than 100 years for gas pipelines, as compared with the 20 30 years typically seen in the field when these mechanisms are operative.
Others, such as those which suggest an impact on HIV viral load are more properly considered a medicine or 'treatment'treatment
Normalization methods potentially mitigate effects more properly considered as batch effects or array effects in addition to addressing the adjustment discussed in this paper.
It finally clarifies labor costs and allows the company's board and creditors to more properly consider their options.
In light of these findings, C. diphtheriae should more properly be considered as a cystathionine β-lyase, rather than a C-S lyase, as annotated (NCBI protein NP_940074).
However, both normal and tumor vasculature can more properly be considered fractal objects because of their irregular shape (spatial conformation), self-similar structure, non-integer dimension and dependence on the scale of observation (scaling effect) [ 19, 35- 37].
I'm not sure the consequences have been properly considered.
Or do they do so because they haven't properly considered the health risks?
