Sentence examples for more p values from inspiring English sources

In the present case, however, more p values were >0.5 (Figure 1B).

In addition, the more P values that are calculated, the higher the odds that any given result will appear to be significant even if it's just the result of chance.

When students submitted research papers to journals, they were always asked by reviewers to provide more P values, a measure of statistical confidence that a result is not due to chance.

In the present case, however, more p values were >0.5.

Figure  2 shows the P value distribution obtained; as expected there are no more P values ≤ 0.05 than would be expected by chance, resulting in a distribution similar to a Uniform distribution.

The P value distribution in Figure  5 indicates that a number of probes are associated with the outcome of interest as there are more P values ≤ 0.05 than would be expected by chance.

The post hoc analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing the VAS score of those not admitted with those admitted for 4 days or more (p value < .05).05

Comparisons of the descriptive scale showed significant differences between those not admitted to those admitted for 1 3 days (p value < .001) as well as those not admitted to those admitted for four days or more (p value < .001).001

P value increases gradually after the cluster number increases to 80. What is more, P value becomes lower and holds steady when the number of clusters arranges from 80 to 120.

In this regard, we observed at least one P-value below 0.001 in 31 patients (including the 13 identified weather sensitive migraineurs), compared to four patients with one or more P-values below 0.001 expected by chance when applying 39 independent tests of significance, suggesting that the amount of 13% weather sensitive migraineurs is likely underestimated (Fig. 3).

We identified far more p-values at a given cutoff for the D. simulans vs. other species indicating that the variation we are analyzing between species is far greater than the variation we observed within the 10 combined-genotypes of D. simulans (6825 significant tests as compared to 5291 in the random assignment at 0.05, 2887 significant compared to 2022 random at 0.001).