Sentence examples for more negative slope from inspiring English sources

The reason behind this phenomenon is the far more negative slope of steam of ammonia compared to other fluids.

Negative response slopes for Y and Fv/Fm, measured as part of a landscape-scale sampling program, revealed the presence of significant diurnal (time-of-day) and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) related variation, with a more negative slope for Y.

A shallower, slope (closer to 0) represents a repertoire that is more diverse and random, whereas a steeper, more negative, slope represents a repertoire that is less diverse and more repetitious.

Only higher serum concentration of β2MG was a predictor of more negative slope of eGFR in linear regression analysis (β = −0.222, SE = 0.111, and P = 0.049).

A more negative slope of eGFR was typical for patients with higher concentration of serum β2MG, but it was independent from eGFR at baseline.

As demonstrated in Figure 3, a more negative slope (a decline from left to right) infers a greater postoperative improvement in hearing.

For the MF/time relationships, there was a side difference (p = 0.01) for the iliocostalis (L3) muscles, the right side showing more negative slopes (more fatigue) than the left side.

An ANOVA demonstrated more negative slopes in the search for a movable target, F 1, 9) = 9.9, p =.01, but the interaction of condition and target presence, F 1, 9) = 13, p =.005, revealed that this was significant only on target-present trials.

More negative (steeper) slopes, which indicate a fast decrease of the size of the visibility areas, are apparent for some measurements with terminal separations below 10 meters and SNR above 40 dB.

The starting point ( {k}_0 ) of the exponential function is chosen to be the value where the slope of ( {z}_k ) becomes more negative than the slope of ( {y}_k ) to prevent high-frequency false estimations.

In contrast, the slope of the linear fit to the response curves in trials with the secondary task was −0.63 (95% bootstrap CI = [−0.75, −0.53]), which was significantly more negative than the slope in trials without the secondary task (average difference = −0.45; 95% bootstrap CI = [−0.61 −0.28]).