Sentence examples for more negative amplitudes from inspiring English sources

In addition, this component seemed to be affected by the predictability of the sentences, because OHS and CHS elicited more negative amplitudes than NS.

As shown in Figure 4C, we consistently found more negative amplitudes for high than for low predictability words within the low frequency (t 31) = −2.25; P = .032) as well as within the high frequency condition (t 31) = −2.54; P = .016).016

This marginal effect was, in turn, driven by relatively more negative amplitudes for the Exposed, relative to the un-exposed Control group, over the left-hemisphere clusters (F1, 28 = 3.96, p = .05).05

Over the left hemisphere, Phoneme Match elicited more negative amplitudes than Phoneme Mismatch, t(17) = 3.92, p = .001 (Fig. 5).

Thus, although target hits appeared to show a small trend for more negative amplitudes at posterior locations relative to related lure correct rejections, only related lure false alarms were reliably more negative than correct rejections for these intervals.

A trend to increased negativity between 100 and 150 ms in PG compared to OG in the win vs. lose difference wave at fronto-central electrode positions (F3, Fz, Cz) resulted from more negative amplitudes in the win relative to the lose condition exclusively in PG, which was potentially driven by prior enhanced rostral cingulate activations in PG.

Posthoc two-tailed t-tests revealed that on right channel sites the fearful condition elicited the more negative amplitude peak (mean = −9.58; SD = 2.4) than the neutral condition (mean = −2.74; SD = 2.4), t(14) = −2.94, p = 0.011.

This was not driven by any one cluster significantly, though List 1 items elicited a marginally more negative amplitude over the midline electrodes in the Exposed groups relative to the Control groups (F1, 56 = 3.43, p = .06).06

In addition, increased negativity in PG compared to OG in the win vs. lose difference wave at left parietal electrode position (P7) resulted from more negative amplitude in win situations than lose situations in PG, whereas OG showed the opposite pattern.

They detected more-negative amplitudes and shorter latencies in adolescents, which suggests more-efficient and -mature processing, akin to adult levels.

No behavioral effects were found, but N2 amplitudes showed a significant Group × Time interaction (at occipito-parietal electrode clusters), which reflected more-negative amplitudes in the meditation group by follow-up.