Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"more large studies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in a sentence when comparing the number or size of studies conducted on a certain topic. For example: - "In order to fully understand the effects of this medication, we need more large studies to be conducted." - "The results of our small study were inconclusive, so we plan to conduct more large studies in the future." - "Recent advances in technology have made it easier to conduct more large studies on this complex issue."
Exact(4)
But it needs to be confirmed by more large studies.
56 More large studies are needed to clarify these relations.
There is a clear need for more large studies of cancer with high-quality measures of exposure to air pollutants, particularly PM2.5, and the ability to control for important risk factors.
In the next few years, we are cautiously optimistic, but clearly, more large studies are needed to establish its efficacy for treatment of diabetic retinopathy and other vascular complications in diabetic patients.
Similar(56)
However, with the availability of genetic data in more and more large study populations, this method remains important for hypothesis generation.
Clearly, this is just one patient's experience: many more, larger studies would be needed before MDMA is adopted as a treatment.
While Ioannidis does have some good suggestions for eliminating bias and relying more on large studies (more data), and reproducibility by separate laboratories to form proper theories, it is hard to see what is new about this.
More large scale studies on young NSCLC patients are warranted.
The relationship between XRCC1 −77T>C and EC susceptibility needs to be clarified by more large size studies.
Potential bias from population difference should be further evaluated through more large epidemic studies.
More large cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings and to examine the effect of IVF treatment characteristics.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com