Sentence examples for more important methodological from inspiring English sources

Arguably, the more important methodological impact of validating these ISLs in both the local cluster and EC2 cloud platforms is on model sharing and computational experiment repeatability amongst various laboratories and collaborators.

One of the more important methodological assumptions that can have a large impact on the estimated value of R is the length of the serial interval or generation time used during the estimation of R. Longer serial intervals have previously been associated with higher estimates of R when compared to estimates from the same dataset using shorter serial intervals [ 9].

Also, previous studies have one or more important methodological limitations such as unstandardized counselling intensity, incomparable or uncontrolled use of pharmacological aids for smoking cessation between experimental and control group, and different (or unclear) baseline levels of lung function and motivation to quit smoking.

Researchers who develop and validate self-efficacy instruments should adhere more closely to important methodological concepts for development and validation of patient-reported outcomes and report their methods more transparently.

The aim of the approach thus is to be considered more important than strict methodological rigour, thus preventing a rigor mortis of visionary creativity and good will.

"Next, the FT corrections that are somewhat more important are based upon methodological choices that are quite debatable (to say the least).

It will prompt researchers to more rigorous consideration of important methodological questions such as: 1.

Others in more recent papers have argued that it is actually more important to examine specific methodological aspects of a paper than to refer to a summary or global rating of quality.

That self-critical notion is already integrated in the concept of a scientific thinking about the future, and it is even more important to reflect it on a methodological layer in a SEF.

Scientists disagree on whether certain types of study design should inherently be respected as providing stronger evidence or whether study quality (i.e., adherence to consensus guidelines on study design, data analysis, and results reporting for particular methodological approaches) is more important.

Regarding healthcare, this methodological aspect is even more important when cost evaluations cover different countries.