Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
more heavier
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"more heavier" is not correct or usable in written English.
The correct phrase would be "heavier" or "more heavy." "More heavier" is a double comparative, which is considered grammatically incorrect. Instead, use the comparative form (-er) or the adverb "more" before the adjective to show increased degree. Example: - Incorrect: Her bag is more heavier than mine. - Correct: Her bag is heavier than mine. If you want to use "more" before the adjective, you can say: - Correct: Her bag is more heavy than mine.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
10 human-written examples
Borlaug's varieties put out more, heavier seeds instead.
News & Media
The team reports finding a strong variation in the elemental abundances of the globular clusters, with those closer to the galaxy having more heavier elements.
Academia
More, heavier and more complex experiments can now be accommodated, the sensors have been upgraded, power can be provided to the experiments and experiment data can be recorded.
Science
Most of these would go away, and a far more elegant view of the world would emerge, if each of the particles in it had one or more heavier (and as-yet undiscovered) partner particles.
News & Media
Analysis of the velocity profile indicates that the particle inertia has a significant effect on the behavior of particles in different size groups: the trajectories of the smaller particles are more influenced by the gas stream in relation to the larger, more heavier, particles.
Science
Contactmusic's Nima Baniamer stated that "Hands All Over", follows a trend consisting of heavy percussions and more heavier backing vocals.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
50 human-written examples
The competition was more heavy".
News & Media
Meteorologists are warning of more heavy rain.
News & Media
More heavy rains were forecast.
News & Media
It will bear no more heavy lifting.
News & Media
"As it gets colder, we make it more heavy".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using double comparatives like "more heavier". Choose either the '-er' suffix (e.g., heavier) or the word 'more' before the adjective (e.g., more heavy), but not both.
Common error
Don't create double comparatives such as "more heavier". Use the correct form: "heavier" or "more heavy". For example, instead of saying "This rock is more heavier", say "This rock is heavier" or "This rock is more heavy".
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "more heavier" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, attempting to describe something that possesses a greater degree of weight or intensity. However, as Ludwig AI states, this construction is grammatically incorrect due to the double comparative.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Science
30%
Wiki
30%
Less common in
Academia
10%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "more heavier" is a grammatically incorrect double comparative. As Ludwig AI clearly indicates, the correct alternatives are either "heavier" or "more heavy". Despite its appearance in a variety of sources, including news, science, and wiki articles, its informal and incorrect structure makes it unsuitable for formal writing. When expressing a greater degree of heaviness, it is essential to use the appropriate comparative form to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
heavier
Uses the correct comparative form of "heavy" without the redundant "more".
more heavy
Corrects the grammar by using "more" with the base adjective "heavy".
increasingly heavy
Emphasizes the gradual increase in heaviness.
substantially heavier
Highlights a significant difference in weight.
considerably heavier
Similar to "substantially heavier", indicating a notable increase in weight.
noticeably heavier
Implies the difference in weight is easily observed.
markedly heavier
Indicates a clear and distinct increase in weight.
significantly heavier
Emphasizes the importance of the difference in weight.
appreciably heavier
Suggests the increase in weight is large enough to be important or relevant.
pronouncedly heavier
Highlights that the increase in heaviness is very noticeable or distinct.
FAQs
Is "more heavier" grammatically correct?
No, "more heavier" is grammatically incorrect. It's a double comparative. You should use either "heavier" or "more heavy".
How do I properly use the comparative form of "heavy"?
Use "heavier" when comparing two things directly. For example, "This box is "heavier" than that one". If you want to use "more", say "This box is "more heavy" than that one".
What can I say instead of "more heavier"?
You can use alternatives such as ""heavier"", ""more heavy"", or "increasingly heavy" depending on the context.
What's the difference between saying something is "heavier" or "more heavy"?
Both "heavier" and "more heavy" are grammatically correct comparatives of "heavy". "Heavier" is generally more concise and common. "More heavy" can be used for emphasis or when the adjective is modified by another word (e.g., "more dangerously heavy").
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested