In a more general case, for instance K > 2 and S > 2, we state the following result: Let p ∗ ∈ P ( b ) be an equilibrium of the game G ( b ) and consider the following conditions: ( i ) p ∗ isunique (79) ( ii ) If ∃ ( k, s ) ∈ K × S : p k, s ∗ > 0, then ∀ j ∈ K ∖ { k }, p j, s ∗ = 0. (80..
In a more general case, for instance K > 2 and S > 2, we state the following result: Let p ∗ ∈ P ( a ) be the equilibrium of the game G ( a ) and consider the following condition: If ∃ ( k, s ) ∈ K × S : p k, s ∗ > 0, then ∀ j ∈ K ∖ { k }, p j, s ∗ = 0. (57).
We also discuss extensions of this algorithm to more general layout instances.
And they took our specific judgments (for instance, in Moore's case, "I know that I have hands") to be, in general, more secure than more general judgments (for instance, again in Moore's case, "I know things about external reality").
For more general application, for instance, to general stress strain laws, the developed GE/EPRI-type solutions are then re-formulated based on the reference stress concept.
If one class of object is connected to another by a "kind of" relationship then the more specific class inherits all the properties of the more general class, for instance a PROforma Component has a property named "Description" and hence Tasks, Data Items and all other kinds of PROforma Component will also have this property.
Our method can potentially be applied to answer more general questions, for instance, instead of taking the cue from a small set of documents initially supplied by the user, data taken from the question itself can be used to score candidate answers.
It is quite possible that this combined action of gene flow and selection may have a more general role in driving instances of rapid diversification (Seehausen, 2004).
This more general approach can for instance be established by choosing the sequence ( Ω j ) j ∈ N such that (81) is guaranteed and such that all the projections Ω i ∗ : = Ω i ∩ ( 0, 1 ) fulfill in addition the property ⋃ i = 1 ∞ Ω i ∗ = ( 0, 1 ).
