Sentence examples for more focused review from inspiring English sources

The paper's goal is to provide a useful resource for those interested in pursuing more focused review of various sectors of the nontrauma HEMS literature.

Automated detection might enable a physician or pharmacologist to perform a more focused review of a few automatically detected stays.

However these tumors will not be discussed in the present review and we refer to a more focused review [ 19].

A number of reviews have already been published examining the clinical effectiveness of self-help treatments delivered via technology, and thus the decision was made to conduct a more focused review of optimal relevance to more traditional therapy formats.

The subject of meteoric metal chemistry was reviewed in 1991 and 2003, and there were also more focused reviews on laboratory studies of metal reactions in 1994 and 2002 and the atmospheric modeling of metals in 2002.

But she signaled that President Bush would support a more narrowly focused review of American intelligence capabilities in the war on terrorism if the inquiry could be done at a time and in a manner under the White House's control.

For example, a review with a broad scope might ask "what adverse effects are associated with antidepressant therapy in humans?" Or, a more narrowly focused review might examine the risk of suicide and suicidal behaviour in adolescents taking a serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

More focused ROAM reviews found that certain groups of migrant women were more likely to have preterm birth [ 9] and inadequate prenatal care [ 10] and that adjustment of background factors in several studies did not explain excess fetal and infant mortality risk in infants born to migrant women compared to those born to receiving-country women [ 11].

A wider additional synthesis (the wider review) was undertaken to support the findings of the focused review and give the final review more explanatory power.

What follows in this article, however, is more focused on systematic reviews about the impacts of an option.

Anderson et al. (2010) Of Chalmers students' (77) revision-oriented comments in asynchronous peer review, more focused on content (47) than language (30) while of Miami students' (74) revision-oriented comments, more focused on language (42) than content (32).