Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Experts seemed to make significantly more fixations and saccades, had a longer scan path and a larger visual span than the laymen.
The data showed that there were more fixations and more regressions, as well as a tendency for larger saccade amplitudes for dyslexic children compared with non-dyslexic children.
The results did show however that both groups had more fixations and longer dwell time for low threat photos presented with a high risk text than for low threat photos presented with a coping text.
Indeed, in smokers we found more fixations and longer dwell time in response to coping information as opposed to high risk information, irrespective of the threat level (high vs. low) of the accompanying smoking-related photos.
Generally, it is accepted that individuals will alter their eye movements in accordance with how difficult a task is, with more difficult tasks leading to the use of more fixations and saccades to process the scene [ 44, 45] and this is reviewed in detail elsewhere [ 46].
Similar(54)
An increase in verification time is likely to result in more fixations, more saccades and a greater sum of all these saccades (i.e., scan path).
On average, the patients made more saccades and more fixations than controls.
On the other hand, the scanning strategy was similar in almost all conditions with more fixations on the eyes and nose than on other areas.
This may result in more fixations to the ground and, in turn, less attention to the traffic, with consequent poorer performance on the street crossing task.
Dyslexics also exhibited more fixations on dual-modality tasks, and longer scanpaths than controls in list layout.
Results of the eye movement data showed that smokers tend to spend more time looking (i.e., more unique fixations and longer dwell time) at the coping information than at the high risk information irrespective of the content of the smoking-related photo.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com