Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Only women with three or more first trimester miscarriages and no live births should be included.
However, most mothers had been pregnant before they had their first child: Eight women had one or more first trimester miscarriages and six women had one or more second trimester losses.
Similar(56)
In total, 10 mothers (23%) experienced one or more second trimester miscarriages (altogether 20) before or after the ICH case.
As the regulations now stand, only new construction of any women's health clinics that provide five or more first-trimester abortions per month must comply with the hospital building standards.
Women in states where abortion was banned would have to travel farther, be gone longer and raise more money for the procedure — resulting in even more second-trimester abortions. .
Women are having more second-trimester abortions (on average, 3 weeks later than their original intent) on account of these barriers or are traveling to other states with less burdensome restrictions.
This study identified seven new potential biomarkers that allow for a more accurate first trimester risk prediction, while confirming the long-known usefulness of PAPP-A.
1 More detailed first trimester ultrasound studies are needed to assess early cardiovascular and metabolic developmental adaptations.
More recently first trimester screening with fetal nuchal translucency, HCG and pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) has provided an earlier, more effective screening method [ 6].
More recently, first trimester screening tests offer women the opportunity of early screening for fetal aneuploidy and the option of earlier diagnosis.
The current study included women with a history of two or more consecutive first trimester miscarriages, depending on the definition used by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ 2] rather than the definition of three or more miscarriages [ 6], which is used traditionally to define RM.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com