more efficient than excess

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "more efficient than excess" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the effectiveness of a method or approach to the drawbacks of having too much of something. Example: "In our analysis, we found that a streamlined process is more efficient than excess resources that lead to waste."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Smart meters, home and grid-scale batteries that store and release excess renewable power, and other modern solutions would be cheaper and more efficient than building new power stations to meet extra demand during relatively short periods.

The Guardian - Opinion

The evidence for alternatives is clear: smart meters, home and grid-scale batteries that store and release excess renewable power, and other modern solutions would be cheaper and more efficient than building new power stations to meet extra demand during relatively short periods.

The Guardian - Opinion

Also competition with an excess of cold unmethylated Sp1a probe was more efficient than with a methylated probe, indicating that Sp1 binds preferentially to the unmethylated Sp1a binding site within the epcam promoter.

British Journal of Cancer

Although oxidative phosphorylation is much more efficient than alternate energy producing pathways, E. coli at high growth-rates and in excess glucose also employs fermentation pathways [ 68].

BMC Systems Biology

More efficient than Germany, even.

The New Yorker

America seems more efficient than Europe.

The New Yorker

Duhon has been more efficient than spectacular.

The New York Times - Sports

The airline is more efficient than many.

The New York Times

LVT is more efficient than income tax.

The Guardian - Opinion

"We are much more efficient than anyone before could be".

The New York Times - Science

"O.P.C. is more efficient than Nigerian police!" Commander says.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing efficiency against excess, clearly define what constitutes "excess" in your specific context to provide a meaningful comparison. For example, "A targeted marketing campaign is "more efficient than excess" advertising spending across multiple platforms."

Common error

Avoid using "more efficient than excess" without specifying the domain or metric of efficiency. Saying "This solution is "more efficient than excess"" is vague. Instead, specify what kind of efficiency you're referring to, such as cost, time, or resource utilization.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more efficient than excess" functions as a comparative expression. It asserts that a particular method, strategy, or system achieves a better outcome, especially regarding resource utilization, compared to a state of overabundance or waste. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "more efficient than excess" is a comparative phrase used to advocate for optimized resource use and highlight the benefits of avoiding waste, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While grammatically correct, the phrase's effectiveness depends on clearly defining what constitutes "excess" in a given context. Given the absence of examples, the frequency and usage contexts could not be determined. Related phrases like "more effective than surplus" and "superior to oversupply" offer alternative ways to express similar concepts. It's essential to avoid overgeneralizing the comparison and to specify the type of efficiency being discussed for maximum impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more effective than surplus

Substitutes "efficient" with "effective", focusing on achieving a desired outcome rather than optimized resource use.

better than abundance

Replaces "efficient" with "better" and "excess" with "abundance", providing a more general comparison of value.

superior to oversupply

Uses "superior" instead of "more efficient" and "oversupply" for "excess", highlighting a higher level of quality or performance.

more streamlined than excessive

Focuses on the reduction of waste and complexity using "streamlined", contrasting it with being "excessive".

more economical than superfluous

Emphasizes cost-effectiveness by using "economical" and replaces "excess" with "superfluous", indicating something unnecessary.

more productive than redundant

Highlights output and usefulness by using "productive", contrasting it with elements that are "redundant" or repetitive.

more optimized than profuse

Focuses on refined performance by using "optimized", contrasting it with being "profuse" or overly abundant.

more lean than lavish

Suggests a focus on minimalism and necessity using "lean", in contrast to something "lavish" or extravagant.

preferable to glut

Uses "preferable" to indicate a favored state and "glut" to denote an overabundance that is often negative.

outperforms surplus

Uses verb "outperforms" which is less formal and "surplus" as an alternative to excess.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "more efficient than excess" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "superior to oversupply", "more economical than superfluous", or "more streamlined than excessive". The choice depends on the specific context and what aspect of efficiency you want to emphasize.

What is a situation where being "more efficient than excess" is particularly important?

Being "more efficient than excess" is crucial in resource management, especially when dealing with limited resources or strict budgets. It ensures optimal output without unnecessary waste. This is relevant in project management, manufacturing, and environmental sustainability.

How does "more efficient than excess" differ from simply being "efficient"?

Being simply "efficient" implies a good use of resources, while being "more efficient than excess" specifically contrasts efficient practices with situations where resources are overabundant or used wastefully. It emphasizes the value of avoiding waste and optimizing resource allocation.

When might it be better to have "excess" rather than focusing on being "more efficient"?

In situations where the cost of running out of a resource is very high (e.g., in emergency response or critical infrastructure), maintaining an "excess capacity" or "redundancy" might be preferable, even if it's not the most efficient approach in normal circumstances.