Sentence examples for more efficient infection from inspiring English sources
It has been reported that up to 5% of PHHs could be infected in vitro at ∼80 mge [3], more efficient infection on primary hepatocytes required HBV of thousands mge [3,4].
This could mean that there are significant differences in receptor recognition and affinity leading to more efficient infection by the H7N9 virus.
We conclude that these metabolic traits are essential for sustainment of cell vitality and thus, a more efficient infection response.
These reports are in agreement with our data showing more efficient infection in nasal polyp explants as compared to normal nasal mucosa.
Importantly, no signs of adaptive evolution that could have resulted in more efficient infection of mosquitoes or birds were identified in any of the recent WNV strains.
Notably, LV pseudotyped with the VSV-G envelope, which only requires binding to phospholipid constituents of most mammalian cells [ 43], achieved much more efficient infection of T cells than is possible with identical vectors pseudotyped with amphotropic retrovirus envelope [ 44].
Finally, the size of the used quartz microparticles (<2 µm) enables homogeneous soil-to-cell contacts (observations at the microscope, not shown) that, in turn, may promote a more efficient cell infection.
More efficient HBV infection was achieved on stable HepG2-hNTCP cells with about 5 10% of the cells being infected as revealed by intracellular staining of HBsAg, whereas there was no HBV infection in the parental HepG2 cells.
This finding is consistent with our results that demonstrated that more efficient EV71 infection occurs in IPEC-J2 cell culture than in PBMCs; this result suggests that intestinal epithelial cells are the major site of viral replication during EV71 infection in neonatal gnotobiotic pigs.
A typical preparation of erythrocytes bound <2.4% of the added p24, but erythrocytes selectively removed essentially all of the viral infectivity as determined by decreased infection of CD4 target cells; however, cell-associated HIV-1 was approximately 100-fold more efficient, via trans infection, than unadsorbed virus for infection of CD4 cells.
Figure 6 shows, in a representative experiment, that when the infectivity of cell-bound HIV-1 was compared to the original unadsorbed free virus, based on p24 values the bound HIV-1 was approximately 100-fold more efficient, via trans infection, for infecting CD4 peripheral blood mononuclear target cells.
