Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Similar(60)
Here we have explored the extent to which larger and more current meta-datasets can be used to improve predictor performance.
Importantly, the results of the current meta-analysis were more than six times larger than those of Lavelle et al. [ 20].
In the context of the current meta-analysis, and more broadly, it is important to know the relationship between these two fitness estimators: To what extent do they agree in terms of the magnitudes of s?
In conclusion, results of the current meta-analysis suggested that more PA was associated with a larger reduction in future ACM and CVD risk in patients with diabetes.
This current meta-analysis, with information on more than 30 000 patients, showed a 34% statistically significant reduction in mortality (1.66% absolute risk reduction) in patients receiving enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention compared with unfractionated heparin.
18 The current meta-analysis particularly illustrates that prevalence is more consistent across samples when clinical assessment is involved.
The main finding of the current meta-analysis is that cohorts with anxiety are more likely to use cannabis (odds of 1.24) or have a cannabis use disorder (odds of 1.68; Table 4).
However, the number of infants in the current meta-analysis (767 infants with neurological outcome reported at 18 months of age or more) is more than double that in the trials whose results are awaited (350 infants).
Conversely, we might have predicted that we would observe lower remission rates in the current meta-analysis as it included a number of studies with more lenient exclusion criteria than typically used in psychiatric clinical trials.
The number of intervention and control groups exceeded the number of studies because some studies included more than one intervention and/or control group that met the inclusion criteria for the current meta-analysis.
The fact that studies with positive results are more likely to be published than negative and non-English studies were excluded in the current meta-analysis might be sources of potential publication bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com