Comparing to the method of ASHRAE, example and other methods it provides more correct results.
For this reason, a sensitivity analysis for the selected index should be carried out, for a better and a more correct interpretation of the results.
Modern chips, for example, queue up several instructions in a "pipeline" and analyse them to see if switching the order in which they are executed can produce the correct result, only more quickly.
The results show that all k-means variants (KM, RKM, KM++, XM) fail to find the correct result in more than 50% of the cases.
Indeed, under these conditions an atom belonging to a given sublattice has only a very small number of neighbors (one or two) in each of the other sublattices, and the molecular field method, which consists in replacing the instantaneous action of an atom by that of an average atom, will be more likely to yield a correct result, the larger the number of atoms to which it is applied.
The latter overall result indicates that the dipstick RDT is more likely than the Pastorex® test to give a positive result, although it does not tell us which of these tests is more likely to give the correct result.
Given that more specific knowledge of the correct result is necessary, consistency effects should occur later than the relatedness effect, i.e. after a longer SOA.
Indeed, incorrect answers close to the correct result are more likely to be experienced than incorrect answers far from the correct result, hence resulting in a stronger representation in verbal memory.
The curator's confidence is made public because a high-quality experiment is more likely to produce a correct result than an experiment the curator has less confidence in.
As predicted, the consistency effect appeared late compared to the relatedness effect, as more specific information about the correct result has to be activated for the former compared to the latter.
