Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
IDBA-Tran reconstructed the most transcripts and consistently reported more correct contigs.
Similar(59)
Increasing depth cutoff progressively may help to preserve more low-depth correct contigs.
We were more correct than we realized.
Mine's far more correct.
We calculate the accuracy with Acc = NC/N, where NC and N represent the number of correct contigs and the number of contigs longer than Ybp respectively.
To further evaluate the performance of each assembly tool, we also provide the information of size distribution of assembled contigs, including number of correct contigs, number of total assembled contigs, largest contig size, average contig size, N50 and N80 contig sizes.
Specificity is the percentage of correct contigs over all reported contigs.
In the calculation of N50 and coverage, only correct contigs are considered.
However, Rosetta models are chemically more correct.
Which is more correct?
The former was designed to generate more complete contigs in de novo assemblies and the latter to correct contig errors in secondary assemblies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com