Sentence examples for more controversial methods from inspiring English sources

It's the reason they are considering far more controversial methods of execution.

However, if Democrats end up dumping some of the more controversial methods of paying for the infrastructure and other big-ticket items in the bill — and most of them annoy Republicans or Democrats or both — either the administration or the House and Senate will still be stuck finding another way to pay for them.

As explained [in the opinion], the initial collection of Mohamud's email communications did not involve so-called "upstreaming" or targeting of Mohamud under § 702, more controversial methods of collecting information.

But he does already show interest in using some more controversial methods during criminal investigations and tries to silence his critics under the cover of "fake news" or by lying about the size of his inauguration crowd, something Russians with Putin propaganda prevalent, are all too familiar with.

A much more controversial method is the use of so-called "optimality models".

Currently, the draft for policymakers makes no mention of solar geoengineering, an even more controversial method that involves spraying sulphate aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect the sun and cool the planet.

The 'Task Force' frequently used controversial methods and more than once recklessly risked lives, so that the Gesamtdeutsches Ministerium, which had initially considered a collaboration, swiftly distanced itself (Stöver, 2014: pp. 215 228; see also Heitzer, 2008; März, 1987).

The lethal control method was more controversial and became increasingly more acceptable as the severity of scenarios was increased and between non-native and native species.

Two methods features are more controversial but preferred for economic evaluation in many settings: CEA using QALYs: although the use of a CEA based on QALYs is often stated as the preferred option to account for the impact of an intervention on HRQoL and survival duration using a consistent generic measure of outcome, this is not always seen as mandatory by all international agencies.

For symptomatic patients, the method is somewhat more controversial (20); however, in these patients, a high CCS has been reported to identify symptomatic patients with a high risk of structural coronary artery stenosis as determined by CAG, whereas a low CCS accurately excluded patients with significant coronary artery stenosis (<1%) (21).

Bayesian methods are one of the more controversial approaches in statistics, with the inherent limitations of being a closed system of logic.