more comprehensive review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "more comprehensive review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing an evaluation or analysis that is thorough and detailed, often in academic or professional contexts. Example: "The committee requested a more comprehensive review of the project's outcomes before making a final decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Inspectors then found additional problems "that really tripped off a more comprehensive review," he said.

The New York Times

Researchers for the Coalition for International Justice released their more comprehensive review last week.

The New York Times

Next month it will publish a more comprehensive review, including eastern neighbours.

The Economist

The results were deemed serious enough that a second, more comprehensive review of the association has been ordered.

The New York Times

The newspaper reported, however, that a more comprehensive review later turned up about 80 officers whose records could be questioned.

The New York Times

NBC News said its ombudsman, David McCormick, was conducting a preliminary review and would file a report on what direction a more comprehensive review should take.

The New York Times

Richardson ordered an "operational pause" in fleet operations that is expected to take one day for urgent safety checks while a more comprehensive review gets under way.

The Guardian

Once they found a fatality linked to the strollers, they began a more comprehensive review and found the additional deaths and some injuries, he said.

The New York Times

"If it encourages that more comprehensive review, then it's not a bad thing," said Daniel Levy, a senior research fellow at the New America Foundation.

The New York Times

In a statement, the board called the audit results "extremely troubling" and said it would proceed with the more comprehensive review.

The New York Times

The present article attempts a more comprehensive review of recent literature in the broader area of mechanics of mechanically fastened joints in polymer matrix composite structures.

Composites Science and Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for precision in reports or academic papers, using "more comprehensive review" signals a thoroughness beyond a simple overview. Always clarify the scope and methodology of the review to establish credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "more comprehensive review" when the scope is limited or preliminary. Ensure the review genuinely covers all relevant aspects before characterizing it as such.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "more comprehensive review" functions as a noun phrase, where "comprehensive" modifies "review," indicating a thorough and complete examination. Based on Ludwig AI's analysis, it's used to describe a review that goes beyond the surface level.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

28%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "more comprehensive review" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a thorough examination, with Ludwig AI confirming its usability. Appearing most frequently in scientific and news contexts, it suggests a deeper and broader analysis than a simple review. To ensure accurate usage, avoid overstating the comprehensiveness if the scope is limited. Alternatives include "more thorough assessment" and "more detailed analysis". When aiming for precision, clarify the scope and methodology of the review.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more thorough assessment

Replaces "review" with "assessment", emphasizing the evaluation aspect.

more detailed analysis

Substitutes "review" with "analysis", focusing on a deeper examination of the subject.

more exhaustive study

Uses "exhaustive study" instead of "comprehensive review", indicating a complete and thorough investigation.

more in-depth examination

Replaces "review" with "examination", adding "in-depth" to stress the level of detail.

more complete evaluation

Uses "complete evaluation" instead of "comprehensive review", highlighting the thoroughness of the assessment.

more extensive investigation

Substitutes "review" with "investigation", indicating a detailed inquiry.

more holistic appraisal

Replaces "comprehensive" with "holistic", suggesting a focus on the entirety and interconnectedness of the subject.

more systematic scrutiny

Emphasizes the structured and methodical nature of the review process.

more wide-ranging survey

Uses "wide-ranging survey" instead of "comprehensive review", stressing the breadth of the examination.

more overarching analysis

Replaces "comprehensive" with "overarching", emphasizing the encompassing nature of the analysis.

FAQs

How is a "more comprehensive review" different from a regular review?

A "more comprehensive review" implies a deeper, more thorough examination than a standard review. It suggests a broader scope, more detailed analysis, and consideration of all relevant aspects of the subject matter.

What are some alternatives to "more comprehensive review"?

You can use alternatives like "more thorough assessment", "more detailed analysis", or "more exhaustive study" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to request a "more comprehensive review"?

It's appropriate to request a "more comprehensive review" when initial findings are insufficient, when the subject matter is complex or multifaceted, or when critical decisions depend on a complete understanding of all relevant information.

What makes a review "comprehensive"?

A review is considered "comprehensive" when it covers all relevant aspects of the subject, incorporates diverse perspectives and data sources, and offers a detailed analysis of the findings. Completeness and attention to detail are key factors.