Sentence examples for more comparable results from inspiring English sources

These studies will provide better information and more comparable results for risk assessments that consider illness as an outcome.

In biomonitoring studies, initial washing of the placenta to remove blood, followed by homogenization of the whole organ, might enable more comparable results to be obtained by researchers.

None of our patients had markedly abnormal hemostasis and we cannot exclude that the instruments would have given more comparable results in patients with severe hemostatic disturbances.

Co-operative efforts, such as assays using common key parameters for imaging and data analyses, could enable to produce more comparable results and gain parallel information for each individual screen.

One way to create more comparable results, and draw solid conclusions, is by forming a priori hypotheses on how specific family adversity factors interacting with specific polymorphisms in specific samples predict specific behavior.

The training program was adjusted to the needs and learning abilities of individual patients, however, for scientific reasons it might have been preferable to standardize the protocol further, in order to gain more comparable results.

This was because the use of cement was most common (n = 27,361, 84%) and it was to make the results more comparable to results from other studies.

The authors propose that when the missed and current promotions are monetary (vs. nonmonetary), consumers perceive that these opportunities are more comparable, which results in consumers expressing higher inaction inertia.

The average cost of a SVD (40 US$ or 2688 rupees) and a CS (162 US$ or 10868 rupees) in our study was substantially higher than other poor countries of Africa and Latin America but more comparable to results from regional studies from Bangladesh [ 27] (year 1995, SVD: US$31.99 and CS: 123 US$ from patient perspective) and India [ 15] (SVD; 8215 rupees and CS; 7012 rupees).

However, labs now have a cost-effective alternative that significantly speeds the process, improves the chain of custody for samples processing and provides standardized, more quantifiably comparable results.

In order to make our results more comparable to the results of the previous study examining cardiac responses in the UG (Osumi & Ohira, 2009), we also tested the difference between accepted and rejected responses.