Sentence examples for more comparability from inspiring English sources

It would be a good thing if the initiative were taken to assemble comparable data and see if more comparability can be brought into quantities which are currently often not comparable.

References are made to standards and standard guides which are continuously being developed as the field matures as a means for promoting more consistency in testing and therefore more comparability of published results.

Overall, though, it is clear that there is more comparability than difference between these two tests in terms of reading and writing.

The costs of the studies were adjusted to U.S. dollars for the year 2011 by using the CPI [17] and the purchasing power parity (PPP) conversion rate of 2011 [19], to achieve more comparability between studies.

The first morning urine used in the current study improved this circumstance by adding more comparability between individuals than pure spot urine as most previous studies did.

Since no instrument was used in all three studies, survey items were compared to select comparable questions for analyses, and items were rescored (mostly dichotomized) to enable more direct comparability.

Such analysis could also allow more direct comparability between perfusion status relative to CMRgl and the distribution of regions implicated in the default network (Raichle et al. 2001).

Most importantly (and in contrast to previous studies), we investigated linguistic and numerical processing by using the same type of tasks, but varying the type of stimuli – namely linguistic (e.g., letters) and numerical (e.g., digits) – thus allowing for more direct comparability.

The Brier score (BS) [ 25] (the average squared difference between the predicted probability and the true occurrence of a binary outcome), and the Brier score scaled (BSS) (a version of the BS that will give a more robust comparability of the accuracy of a model because it is not depending on population differences of the outcome), were also calculated.

Looking at the question of pay comparability more generally, DiSalvo has a largely fair discussion of the literature on the topic.

Additionally, not all policies and outcomes of interest were collected through standardized, country-level sources, making comparability more challenging for some indicators.