Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
In addition, significantly higher proportions of exposed women smoked more cigarettes during pregnancy and were less likely to breastfeed and take prenatal vitamins.
Truck drivers had higher BMI, reported a higher number of pack-years of smoking, smoked more cigarettes during the study time, and included a higher proportion of usual alcohol drinkers.
A current smoker was defined as a person who currently smoked (ie, responded yes to a question about smoking cigarettes) and who had smoked 100 or more cigarettes during his/her lifetime.
We classified smoking behaviour of samples into 3 groups: "non-smoker" referred to a person who never smoked, "past smoker" referred to a person who smoked 100 or more cigarettes during his/her lifetime but stop smoking at the time of interview, "current smoker" referred to a person who smoked 100 or more cigarettes during his/her lifetime and was still smoking at the time of the interview.
Similar(55)
Results indicated that subjects smoked more cigarettes per day during the LL phase and CO boost was greater during MLF.
Subjects were considered smokers if they had been smoking 10 or more cigarettes a day during the past 5 years [22].
We defined daily smoking as smoking one or more cigarettes per day during the first six months postpartum.
Subjects were asked if they had ever smoked, if they had smoked (defined as one or more cigarettes per day) during the pregnancy, and if so, the average number of cigarettes smoked per day.
Smokers who had smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day during the previous year and had no period of smoking abstinence longer than 3 months in the past year, and met DSM-IV criteria for nicotine dependence were eligible for the study.
The relationship appears to be dose-dependent; the more cigarettes a mother smokes during pregnancy, the greater the risk to her child.
Male employees smoked more cigarettes as compared to female during working hours (9.6 vs. 2.9, p < 0.01), as well as per day (20.3 vs. 9.9, p < 0.05) (Table 1).> -wrap-foot> *independent-testst.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com