Sentence examples for more bone stock from inspiring English sources

Hemiarthroplasty is a potentially attractive alternative to knee replacement for young, active patients, as it allows preservation of more bone stock for potential revisions.

The implants produced were bigger in size, risking more bone stock in endosteal through surgery [ 8, 37, 38].

As a result of relying on Western standards, these implants and device are bigger in size and more bone stock in the medullary canal is put a risk during the surgery.

Moreover if in the long term it is necessary to perform a replacement this will be technically easier in cementless prostheses because we will have more bone stock for future revision surgery, considering that today hip arthroplasties are implanted at very young patients with high functional demands [ 119– 121] that possibly will need in the long term this type of surgery.

For younger or more active patients, the removal of the more proximal bone stock makes the revision surgery unreliable and even leads to subsequent surgery with increasingly difficult problems and poorer results [ 1, 5, 15, 17].

Short femoral stems provide the opportunity to avoid such resurfacing-specific complications while potentially saving more femoral bone stock than conventional femoral stems.

Fine-tuning of the technique is also needed for cases in which there is more loss of bone stock preoperatively.

A difference of 4 points may be clinically important (Hoeksma et al. 2003) and such a discrepancy is not surprising considering the preoperative conditions including multiple surgeries, more serious infections, limited bone stock, and deficiency of the greater trochanter.

The MOM Hip Resurfacing System has been proposed to have advantages such as enhanced longevity (Chan et al. 1999, Sieber et al. 1999, Firkins et al. 2001), enhanced implant fixation (Grigoris et al. 2006), lower dislocation rate (Scifert et al. 1998), better reproduction of hip mechanics, and more native femoral shaft bone stock left for revision surgery (Shimmin et al. 2008).

Fehring et al. reported that wedge-shaped augmentation was more favorable than block-shaped augmentation for bone stock preservation, although blocks were more advantageous for load bearing because they allowed for a planar bone-implant interface [ 26].

This conservative hip replacement has been developed to preserve bone stock and produce more physiologic loading of the proximal femur.