Exact(6)
In a memorable 1976 paper, Donald T. Campbell explained that "the more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor".
It states, "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures, and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor".
The argument runs thus: The smaller the quantity of a given substance the more apt it is to be acted upon by surrounding bodies.
This is line with Campbell's law that The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor as is known for accountability systems (Campbell, 2010).
Hanushek thus seems to deny Campbell's Law, "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor".
It holds that 'the more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures - and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.'".
Similar(2)
Who wants to do boring research or analysis when they could do something as cool-sounding as "due diligence?" One place you don't hear it all that much--but where the concept is more apt than it is in other areas of business--is in the job search.
If more women start dying again because they are forced to seek illegal abortions, then Erdogan's odd analogy to the massacre at Uludere may turn out to be more apt than it should.
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com