Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
More affluent smokers, on the other hand, have found that buying cigarettes on the street is a way to keep smoking without, well, really smoking.
Disadvantaged smokers are less likely to be successful when trying to stop smoking than more affluent smokers.
Smokers from lower socioeconomic groups are less likely to be successful in stopping smoking than more affluent smokers, even after accessing cessation programmes.
More affluent smokers may be more willing to access products over the counter, which have to be paid for out of pocket.
We found that 64%95%5% CI 60 to 68) of more disadvantaged smokers were very or extremely determined to quit compared with 57%95%5% CI 51 to 62) of more affluent smokers.
In general, quit rates in this study followed those reported in previous research: more affluent smokers, older clients and clients taking varenicline or combination therapy were most likely to quit (Brose et al., 2011; Ferguson et al., 2005).
Similar(52)
Socioeconomic disadvantage has an important role to play in the differences in success rates in stopping smoking between more and less affluent smokers.
Affluent smokers were more likely to quit than disadvantaged smokers (OR 1.38 (1.35 to 1.42) for clients who paid for prescriptions compared to those eligible for free prescriptions).
It also found that pregnant smokers from more affluent areas were more successful with their attempts to stay free of cigarettes.
Further evidence suggests that NRT is more effective when used in combination with behavioural support (NICE, 2008), but there is insufficient evidence to confirm whether NRT is more or less useful for disadvantaged or affluent smokers (Amos et al., 2011).
Significant declines occurred primarily among children of non-smokers 16 17 and from more affluent families.
More suggestions(15)
more affluent countries
more affluent groups
more disadvantaged smokers
more affluent populations
more affluent peers
more affluent communities
more affluent refugees
more affluent customers
more obese smokers
more affluent diabetes
more active smokers
more affluent women
more past smokers
more current smokers
more affluent students
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com