Sentence examples for more accurate validation from inspiring English sources

A more accurate validation of DEM would involve an assessment of the ability of DEM to predict these forces.

The study further indicates the building and measurement data that are critical for a more accurate validation of thermal-ventilation models, including, on-site measured temperature, wind, and solar conditions; measured volume flow rate data, at critical points throughout the building; and effective area and discharge coefficients for specific vents used in building.

This study did not exclude subjects based on any MMPI-2 validity scales to avoid exclusion of those in the most severe state of illness for a more accurate cross-validation with the DSSI.

(3) In order to assess every model in more accurate manner, cross-validation (usually tenfold) is used and average classification error is computed.

The results of this study highlight the complexity of the structure-function relationships that govern the mechanical response of the AF in radial and circumferential shear, and provide new and more accurate data for the validation of material models and tissue-engineered disc replacements.

The problem of over-fitting can potentially be a real concern for the supervised techniques (MGD, MDA, ANN) and evaluations of their performances are more accurate when using cross-validation procedures.

If correlation is found to impact plan optimality, then this will justify further work into the development and validation of more accurate models of correlation.

Predictions were more accurate when animals within the validation group were more closely related to animals in the training set.

More advanced techniques, such as motor unit number index, Bayesian MUNE, and electrical impedance myography, are more accurate but still need further validation against neuropathological correlates [ 23– 25].

I like the choice of the term validation as more accurate than "quality" and it fits quite well with Callaghan's useful distinction between technical and scientific review, but I think the authors overemphasize the peer-review style approach.

This way of validation guaranties a more accurate estimate of the generalization error of the approach.