Sentence examples for morally wrong actions from inspiring English sources

For sometimes actions that are done for the sake of good are, nevertheless, morally wrong actions.

Such evils certainly do not appear to result from morally wrong actions.

After all, some of even the most obviously morally wrong actions can be seen to promise some good — a robber might kill dozens in order to get the money he needs to pursue genuine goods — and the natural law theorist wants to be able to say why these obviously morally wrong actions are morally wrong.

Our fundamental moral obligation, then, is to respect persons; morally right actions are thus those that express respect for persons as ends in themselves, while morally wrong actions are those that express disrespect or contempt for persons by not valuing them as ends in themselves (Wood 1999).

Some theorists, such as John Mackie, argue that there can be no right to perform a morally wrong action since wrong actions are acts we are morally required not to perform (Mackie, 1978).

Then it follows that it is impossible for an omnipotent and omniscient being to perform a morally wrong action, and therefore that the failure of such a being to prevent various evils in this world cannot be morally wrong.

As we saw earlier, in the paradigm cases corrupt actions are a species of morally wrong, habitual, actions.

In the Analogy, Butler argued that we have probable evidence that our morally right and wrong actions will be judged and rewarded and punished by God and that this life is a probationary period where we act in ways that will be ultimately judged.

In philosophical ethics, normative theories are typically understood as systematic accounts regarding the question of what constitutes morally right or wrong actions, or – in an evaluative sense – good or bad human conduct ([ 32], p. 1).

Those responses make sense only if you believe that such behavior is morally wrong -- that the actions are moral offenses, transgressions of moral norms that the offenders should have complied with and can rightly be condemned for violating.

For, while the existence of solidarity and identification may allow us to talk about a group over time and even label its actions morally wrong,they do not allow us to posit the kind of agency that is required of moral responsibility as traditionally understood.