Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Instead wRw′ holds just in case world w′ is a morally acceptable variant of w, i.e. a world that our actions can bring about which satisfies what is morally correct, or right, or just.
Slavoj Zizek's assertion of atheist superiority is based on his idea that atheists, unlike fundamentalists, do good deeds because it is morally correct, and not in order to attain God's favor.
And we do things that are ethically and morally correct, not just what's legal.
Thus one might subscribe to an act-utilitarian account of morally correct action whilst not demanding that someone like George approach life by deliberating in strictly utilitarian ways.
Unless the decisions are all correct on the merits, any principle based on them must itself be flawed: for if it were morally correct it would not support the mistaken decisions.
Unfortunately, the choice of the morally correct action is not always clear because choices are made in the grey areas of life where the context is filled with subtle nuances.
> entered is correct or not.
His forecast, correct or not, is fatalistic.
You'll either be correct or not.
There was no compelling theory for why some prices were morally correct and some were not; further, there was nothing to ensure that the mechanism by which these prices were determined was legitimate.
In other words, agents on these accounts are autonomous only if they make morally correct choices or choices that coincide with their objective interests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com