Exact(60)
Is it plausible to respond to the rejection of absolute moral facts with a relativistic view of morality?
The reason is that our relativism about etiquette does not actually dispense with all absolute moral facts.
When we reject absolute moral facts is moral relativism the correct outcome or is it moral eliminativism (nihilism)?
Suppose we take this point on board, though, and admit that there have to be some absolute moral facts.
Universal human values can be understood as something like moral facts, marking out goods and evils that are generically human.
Are there moral facts?
But which moral facts do they determine?
Moral facts fix the relevance of other factors.
If there are moral facts, what is their origin?
and training them to be responsive to moral facts themselves.
The account of moral facts that he finds most promising is one that identifies moral facts with reason facts.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com