Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
When using published criteria regarding insulin resistance24 for M corrected for lbm (by DXA), two subjects at baseline and one subject in each treatment group at 6 months were categorized as insulin resistant.
Using published suggestions for insulin resistance based on M/I adjusted for lbm,25 four subjects at baseline and three subjects receiving CLA and two receiving placebo at 6 months were categorized as insulin resistant.
Using a criterion for insulin resistance based on HOMA,24 nine subjects at baseline and four subjects (three subjects receiving CLA) after 6 months were categorized as insulin resistant.
Questionnaire data collected at 18 months were categorized into early behavioural scales of anxiety, ADHD, and emotional dysregulation.
Participants who reported no anal, vaginal or oral sex in the past 12 months were categorized according to self-reported sexual orientation.
Those who indicated that they had sex with both men and women in the past 2 months were categorized as MSMW.
Similar(43)
Disease activity across the 12 months was categorized as consistently inactive, consistently active, or fluctuating between inactive and active, based on two consecutive six-month MIBDI assessments.
To make the dependent variable categorical the comparison between the EQ-5D scored before surgery and ICU admission and that scored at 3 months was categorized as the "same" when there was no difference between any items, and "different" when at least one EQ-5D item at 3 months was different in comparison with that before surgery and ICU admission.
Responses to prior LBP episodes over the previous 12-months were categorized as "yes" or "no".
Ames dwarf and N male mice, 3 6 months old, were categorized into two groups: visceral fat removal (VFR) and sham-operated, respectively.
Physical activity was assessed based on average daily energy expenditure in leisure time physical activities (kcal/kg/day) in the past 3 months, and were categorized as inactive (0 1.5), moderate (1.5 3), and active (≥3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com