Sentence examples for monthly mean differences from inspiring English sources

The monthly mean differences are also shown, and they range from −50 to 40%%.

Gray open circles are the differences between the measured and calculated tropospheric opacities, and blue closed circles and error bars denote the monthly mean differences and their standard deviations (±1σ), respectively.

Although the individual differences in the opacities between Nemuro and Sapporo were up to ~100%% due likely to spatial variability of H2O, the monthly mean differences in the opacities were less than 15%% (i.e., smaller than bias in the measured opacity) since the spatial variability was decreased by taking the monthly mean.

Figure 1 also presents the altitude-latitude structures of the monthly mean differences of zonal mean velocities due to inclusion of OGW effects for the easterly QBO phase (Fig. 1b) and differences between the westerly and easterly QBO phases without OGW effects (Fig. 1c) in January.

Monthly mean temperature differences of up to 1 °C were measured at the native sites.

Lesser than 95%% confidences were obtained only in regions where the absolute monthly mean wind differences are smaller than 0.1 m/s in Fig. 1b, c.

We applied the paired t tests (Rice 2006) to these sets, which gave higher than 95%% confidences of nonzero monthly mean wind differences in 1559 of 1728 900 %) grid points in latitude and altitude used for plotting Fig. 1c and similar results for Fig. 1b.

However, there was no difference between hydrophilic and sterile non-coated catheters when outcomes were measured as mean monthly UTIs (mean difference = 0.01 (−0.11 to 0.09), P=0.84) or total UTIs at 1 year (mean difference = 0.18 (−0.50 to 0.86), P=0.60).

Since solar radiation data were not available for these sites, we calculated monthly mean values, using differences between temperature extremes following procedures outlined by Coops et al. ([2000]).

Therefore, if the monthly mean value of the differences between the measured and the calculated opacities was used for the correction of the measured opacity, the effects of the change in the radiosonde launch site as well as of the spatial variability of H2O between the MWR and radiosonde launch sites could be significantly reduced.

Thus, the individual measured opacity was corrected on the basis of the monthly mean value of the percentage differences between the measured and the calculated opacities.