Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
Fig. 1 Change in number of headache days per month at baseline and follow-up.
Headache frequency (number of attacks per month) at baseline was calculated within the last 6 months retrospectively.
There were no significant differences between R-group patients and NR-group patients in age, sex, level of education, age at headache onset, duration of chronic headache or number of days with headache per month at baseline.
Interestingly, in one study, 11 of the 67 (16%) patients who had 5 to 14 migraine days per month at baseline, experienced no migraine days during the 12 week study period, versus no patients in the placebo group [34].
Compared to subjects without headache and CMSCs, pure headache < 7 days / month at baseline gave a 40% increased risk of insomnia, while pure headache ≥ 7 days / month gave a 110% increased risk (Table 4).
At follow-up, only 1.3%% of the patient used medication on more than 15 days per month, at baseline 24%% of the patients showed this pattern of medication use.
Similar(38)
To determine if optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline or month 3 in the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) and Treatment of Macular Edema following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) studies provides information that predicts visual outcome.
Examinations included ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography (FLA) and OCT at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
Patients with SLE had normal levels of APRIL at baseline, and during depletion there was a significant decrease.
Christenbury and associates previously showed a positive correlation between hyperreflective foci in SD OCT at baseline and GA development at 2 years of follow-up in intermediate dry AMD.
Specifically eyes from the MIVI-TRUST programme with concurrent SD-OCT and TD-OCT at baseline and day 28 were included, and the study concluded that SD-OCT may be superior for formal clinical trial grading due to greater inter-reader reproducibility.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com