The phrase "monopoly of force" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a situation in which a political or economic power holds control over all sources of authority in a given region or country. For example, "The government maintains a monopoly of force in the country, allowing them to decide who has access to what resources."
A monopoly of force is the definition of a state, or a "Palestinian Authority".
A government's maintenance of a monopoly of force within the area of its claimed sovereignty is one of the basic requirements of statehood.
"A state at its most basic has a monopoly of force," says Anas al-Gomati, who runs Sadeq, a Libyan think-tank.
In general, civilization involves the rise of legal institutions and the acquisition of a legal monopoly of force by a government.
"Particularly with the state having the monopoly of force, when data is collected and you don't know – that's where the principles of consent and accountability is needed.
He gave terrorists free rein and thereby relinquished the monopoly of force over his society, hoping that violence would improve his position in future negotiations.
This "civilising process" – a term Pinker borrows from the sociologist Norbert Elias – has come about largely as a result of the increasing power of the state, which in the most advanced countries has secured a near-monopoly of force.
Nation states, with their legitimate monopolies of force, will have to fill this vacuum.
In Iraq, the state's lack of a monopoly on force has produced obvious negative consequences.
These regimes lack legitimacy, which is the key to Weber's definition of the monopoly on force.
The concept of a "monopoly on force" might sound foreign or even frightening to Americans that take great pride in our revolutionary beginnings, but it is the fundamental organizing principle of any political entity, including the United States.
