Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
With regard to exposure assessment method, meta-estimates from studies using fixed site monitors were compared to those from studies using modeling-based estimation techniques, for example, land use regression.
Similar(59)
To develop a valid statistical method of showing acceptable cardiac output (CO) trending ability when new CO monitors are compared to a reference standard, such as thermodilution, using polar coordinates.
To perform the tests, the method described by Geijer et al was used, whereby the visibility of a target structure in a presented image on each of the two selected monitors was compared with the corresponding structure presented on a monitor displaying a reference image, and the observer would give a score for each of the selected monitors.
When the mean HR measurements obtained throughout the monitoring were compared, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.818 > 0.05).
When the mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements obtained throughout the monitoring were compared, a statistically significant difference was determined between the groups (P = 0.048).
When the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements obtained throughout the monitoring were compared, a statistically significant difference was determined between the groups (P = 0.017).
When the mean blood pressure (MBP) measurements obtained throughout the monitoring were compared, a statistically significant difference was determined between the groups (P = 0.047).
Suppression ratios from the BIS monitor were compared with suppression ratios of full-channel EEG as assessed by quantitative visual analysis.
A total of 675 women who underwent weekly monitoring were compared with 315 women who performed SMBG four times per day.
A recently reported randomised controlled trial (FACS) in which regular CEA and/or CT monitoring were compared with minimum follow-up showed no survival advantage associated with earlier detection through monitoring.
The mean difference in the number of days (within the last 7 days), from baseline to 12 months of follow-up that participants reported using specific diabetes self-care activity features, measured by the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities instrument, to assist with diabetes self-care activity monitoring were compared between treatment arms (table not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com