Institutional monitoring of error data following implementation often resulted in considerable error reduction.
The PC paradigm also tends to support situated or embodied conceptions of cognition, for it views action as a dynamic interaction between the organism's effects on the environment, its predictions concerning those effects (its plans), and its continual monitoring of error, which provides feedback to help ensure success.
These findings suggest an important role for the caudate in the inhibition of habitual response and the monitoring of error performance associated with deceptive responses.
Especially, the monitoring of performance errors serves to optimize future response behavior.
These results highlight the need for the monitoring of medication errors and adverse effects before, during and after advertising.
In response to a follow-up questionnaire distributed in August 2014, some of the pharmacovigilance centres represented at the workshop reported subsequent modifications of their processes to improve monitoring of medication errors as part of their routine pharmacovigilance activities.
In the first reported application of a multiphase design to multi-stage laboratory analyses, the design was shown to offer considerable advantages over traditional approaches particularly in reducing total sample number, time and cost of analysis, as well as more comprehensive monitoring of experimental error.
On top of that, any outside monitoring of its error-prone optical scan machines (widely used there and around the country) and election procedures is spotty at best.
Observers can perform steering adjustments quite accurately even in the face of substantial occlusion of visual input [6], yet other studies suggest continuous monitoring of steering error [2], [7].
As discussed earlier, greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate (BA 32) is implicated in inhibitory control of behavior, monitoring of information, error detection and conflict processing, and could explain greater activation in the Average IQ participants (Konishi et al. 1998; Garavan et al. 1999; Konishi et al. 1999; Braver et al. 2001).
