Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
Results: Blood glucose monitoring frequency was the sole modifiable predictor of HbA1c (P <.0001).
A path analysis showed that the total monitoring frequency was significantly positively related to the score for total negative thoughts, which in turn, was significantly positively related to the total number of safety behaviours used.
Mean blood glucose monitoring frequency was 5.5 ± 0.8 checks daily, and mean A1C was 7.5 ± 0.8% (range 5.8 10.3%).
Clinician-reported blood glucose monitoring frequency was based on data from patient logbooks and/or meter downloads.
The blood glucose (BG, mg/dl) target was 90 to 120 and the monitoring frequency was every 3 hours, or every 1 hour when the patient received i.v. IN infusion.
Satisfaction with the monitoring frequency was associated with: higher age, a better physical health, less diabetes-related distress, higher diabetes treatment satisfaction, less experienced hyper- and hypoglycaemias and a lower LDL and diastolic blood pressure (Table 2).
Similar(53)
However, the model predicts large differences in overall mortality rates between the three treatment centres, even when the same monitoring frequency is used.
Despite this, patients who determined their own monitoring frequency were more satisfied.
Relationships between personality traits and HbA1c and monitoring frequency were examined using regression models and mixed-design ANOVA.
However, currently the monitoring frequency is mostly determined by the physician in patients with chronic diseases [ 15- 18].
Patient's satisfaction with monitoring frequency is of interest when implementing six-monthly monitoring for well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com