If some enforcement mechanism becomes inevitable, one solution might be to create a standing inter-university body charged with monitoring equitable access licenses.
We believe this should be considered in developments regarding surgical monitoring, to permit equitable and accurate performance assessment, addressing concerns of patients, surgeons and policymakers alike.
This may require health systems committing to targets for improvements in outcomes, regular monitoring of progress, equitable allocation of resources based on health need, and the integration of the needs of people with comorbid mental health problems into mainstream healthcare and public health initiatives.
Decision implementation should be routinely monitored to ensure the equitable provision of care.
However, it is clear, that there are many additional research, policy and educational challenges, which must be solved, to establish and support systems to guide and to monitor the transformations to sustainable, equitable, livable, low/post-fossil carbon societies.
As reforms unfold, the challenge will be to harness the potential innovation, efficiency, and responsiveness of private providers, while enhancing capacity to regulate and monitor in order to assure equitable access and avoid unhealthy market segmentation.
Local management, accountability and monitoring may be important in implementing equitable and accountable community health financing schemes.
However, clear goals and procedures are crucial, and we also recommend routinely monitoring decision implementation to ensure the equitable provision of care.
Insure health system accountability in equitable care quality by tracking, monitoring and reporting equity quality measures.
In the continuous development and revision of the QOF indicators by the NHS and its partners, equity has to be a point of particular interest, and the impact of the chosen indicators on equitable care has to be monitored carefully.
