Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
It means that the binding energy for these carbon atoms with gas molecules is larger than for the edge atoms.
The optimized lattice constant of monolayer MoS2 is 3.12 Å, and consequently, the distance between two neighboring gas molecules is larger than 12 Å.
The positive value of ΔS° shows the increased randomness with MB adsorption, probably because the number of desorbed water molecules is larger than that of adsorbed MB molecules.
This happens because in these systems, the sum of π π interactions between the common surfaces of the nanotube molecules is larger than these interactions in the corresponding non-bundled systems due to the less contact surface of the solvent with the bundled CNTs.
We found the first contact peak between CH4 and CH4 is more significant than between C2H6 and C2H6, but at a separation distance of ~4.4 6.9 Å, the curve of the C2H6 C2H6 RDF is above that of CH4 CH4, indicating that the separation between C2H6 molecules is larger than the distance between the CH4 molecules and C2H6 is loosely packed compared with CH4.
In general, the GC content in the paired portion of tRNA molecules is larger than for unpaired nucleotides.
Similar(53)
When ambient RH is high, the number of adsorbed water molecules is large.
However, if the number of molecules is large, then there is greater probability of several molecules being in the same chamber, and therefore the number of positive chambers would be significantly lower compared with the number of molecules in the chambers.
Sets of coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can effectively represent chemical reactions when the number of molecules is large and mass action approximations are appropriate.
Because the molecules are larger, they can be placed into a solution and sprayed onto a piece of glass.
As known, polarities of biodiesel molecules are larger than those of petrodiesel molecules, for the existence of carbonyls in biodiesel.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com