Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The formation of 2D molecular patterns has been characterized by ΔR, BAM, XRD and XPS.
Similar(59)
Necrotic cells are postulated to release endogenous molecules that, using similar nomenclature to pathogen-associated molecular patterns, have been named damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).
Numerous danger-associated molecular patterns and pathogen associated molecular patterns have been reported to signal via the NLRP3 inflammasome, including bacterial cell wall components, bacterial RNA or bacteria themselves, such as Listeria monocytogenes or Staphylococcus aureus.
The triggering of innate immune responses by pathogens and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) has been identified as an early and primary mechanism [2, 31, 33 36].
The discovery of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) as receptors recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) has led to a proliferation of interest in innate immunity [8], [9], [10].
The concept of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) has been proposed to explain the immunogenic potential of stressed or dying/dead cells.
Although differences in the magnitude of insult depending on the type of pathogen, that is, the type of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), have been already recognized [ 13], few studies have examined this difference quantitatively.
Lipopolysaccharide, which belongs to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), had been shown to induce IL-1β from human synovial macrophages [ 8].
Furthermore, host-derived stress signals otherwise known as danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) have also been shown to induce activation of NLRs.
Alternatively, isolated microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) have been investigated to activate the immune system against the cancer are thus limited [9] [11].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) that are involved in plant innate immunity triggered by pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) have been identified in Arabidopsis[ 26].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com