Suggestions(4)
Exact(1)
Most popular molecular databases like PubChem [46, 47], PDSP Ki [48], and ChEMBL [42] have become leading cheminformatics resources.
Similar(59)
It is well known that the frequency of various substructure features like scaffolds, substituents or linkers in molecular databases follows the power law (so called "long tail" distribution) [8].
Graphical Abstract Database fingerprint captures the key information of molecular databases to perform chemical space characterization and virtual screening.
The evaluation shows a mismatch between pharmaceutical and molecular databases.
The core of GraphSAW represents the database, which integrates drug-related pharmaceutical and molecular databases.
In addition to these specialized resources, β-lactam antibiotic resistance information can also be extracted from popular molecular biology databases like GenBank (15) and UniProt (16).
They are subsequently stored in a molecular database together with information like PDB classification of the protein, metal content, number of interacting groups in the binding site or different properties of the pyrophosphate.
For example, in-silico analyses are still quite restricted when compared to other species, like Arabidopsis, for which more exhaustive phenotypic and molecular database repositories are available.
The sequences were submitted to NCBI molecular database.
Despite the importance of cooperative interactions in regulating biological molecular systems, they are currently not adequately captured in bioinformatics resources, for instance, interaction databases such as IntAct (26), the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP) (27) and the Molecular Interaction database (MINT) (28), but also pathway databases like Reactome (29).
The interactions are extracted from the literature using a Natural Language Processing NLPP) tool run on Medline abstracts (NLP references), plus those obtained from external curated databases like BIND (Biomolecular Interaction Network Database) [ 10] and MINT (Molecular INTeraction) [ 11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com