Suggestions(1)
Exact(6)
The monophyly of this genus is strongly rejected by the molecular data (Table 5).
The monophyly of this tribe is strongly rejected by our molecular data (Table 5).
In addition, the monophyly of Bryconamericus is strongly rejected by our molecular data (Table 5).
This process will yield signatures that can be captured with molecular data (Table 2).
The alternative hypothesis of a Pipinae clade could not be rejected by our molecular data (Table 1 and Additional file 1, Table S2).
For the STAR analysis presence (yes) or absence (no) of the clade is indicated aSome gene trees did not support the monophyly of Stevardiinae The monophyly of genera Bryconamericus, Cyanocharax, Hemibrycon, and Knodus is strongly rejected by topology tests based on the molecular data (Table 5).
Similar(54)
For the molecular data set (Table 2), we also estimated the topological Mickevich-Farris ILD or TILD [ 42].
According to the cytogenetic and molecular data compiled (Table 1), the most commonly found rDNA arrangement was the unlinked (S-type) configuration.
The grafting density was calculated from the % weight loss along with the corresponding molecular weight data (Table 2) as obtained from GPC measurements.
However, the BYS morphological tree was still not congruent with the molecular data (P≤ 6E-09, Table 5).
The clinical, cytological, phonotypical and molecular data are summarized in Table 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com