Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(20)
Overjet and molar relationships were improved by an average of 4.7 and 3.1 mm, respectively.
However, long-term stability of cases finished with class II molar relationships is questionable [13],[13].
Overjet and sagittal molar relationships improved by an average of 3.9 and 5.2 mm, respectively.
At the end of treatment, all cases displayed class I canine and molar relationships and reduction of the ANB angle.
Resolving class II molar relationships by distalizing maxillary molars may be indicated for patients with minor skeletal discrepancies [1].
Ending up with stable class I incisor, canine and molar relationships are the goal of any orthodontist.
Similar(40)
Class II molar relationship 3.
Figure 6 shows the net molar relationship correction.
Table 1 Calculation of overjet and molar relationship changes Overjet Molar relationship Skeletal contributions Skeletal contributions 1.
The primary selection criterion was that patients presented a full class II molar relationship on one side and class I molar relationship on the opposite side.
Figure 6 Skeletal and dental contributions to molar relationship correction (T2-T1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com