Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
Class II Division 1 malocclusion (Class II molar relationship with proclined upper incisors).
Treatment with RME did not affect significantly either dental measurements or molar relationship with respect to the untreated controls.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1. Class II Division 1 malocclusion (Class II molar relationship with proclined upper incisors) 2.
Specifically, the complete class II molar relationship with class I canine relationship was also regarded as a good outcome.
In the present investigation, the treatment with RME did not affect significantly the anteroposterior skeletal mandibular response as well as the molar relationship with respect to the CG.
All patients met the following inclusion criteria: (1) class II division 1 malocclusion with bilateral class II molar relationship (with a minimum severity of one-half class II molar relationship), (2) no craniofacial syndromes or systemic diseases, (3) no tooth agenesis or missing permanent teeth, and (4) mandibular arch showing minimal or no crowding.
Similar(54)
Correction of the molar relationship was achieved with the BAPA with palatal intermaxillary fixation screws for anchorage in the first group (n = 22) and with the CPA in the second group (n = 17).
In addition, there was no significant difference in molar relationship between patients with and without tori (P = 0.400).
The National Center for Health Statistics reported that 20.4% of 6- to 11-year-olds have bilateral class II molar relationships, compared with 14.5% of 12- to 17-year-olds [2,3].
Analyzing the two samples throughout the observation period (T0-T2), we found that correction of molar relationship occurred in both groups with no significant differences in terms of sagittal and vertical skeletal changes.
The small number of patients with Class III molar relationship in our sample, and the possibility that these cases present with mild Class III malocclusion lacking the usual developmental pattern of compensation might explain the lack of the square arch form in the study sample.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com