Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
β-Glucan was detected in a wide molar mass range, <2000 to approximately 6.7 × 106 g/mol.
The reliability of the method is illustrated by investigations on narrowly distributed pullulan standards in the molar mass range from 105 to 106 g mol−1.
The Ziegler Natta type provides a wide molar mass range where both the isotactic average length (n1) and the nature of the isotacticity interruptions change according to chain size.
The separation capability of AsFlFFF with programmed cross flow was tested for water-soluble hydroxypropyl cellulose covering the molar mass range from 5.8 to 1,600 kDa [ 27].
However, the separation with an exponential decay program was more favorable when selectivity in the high molar mass range was needed.
Similar(55)
The results showed that the enzyme pool presents several bands with a molar mass ranging from 10 to 60 kDa.
Well-defined α-hydroxy,ω-alkoxy ester telechelic PHBs, of molar mass ranging up to M¯n= 42,600gmol−1 were thus quantitatively obtained and fully characterized by NMR, MALDI-TOF MS and SEC analyses.
Consistent with their large molar mass (ranging from 349 g/mol for bexarotene to 607 g/mol for fulvestrant) and high hydrophobicity, each molecule formed clearly detectable particles, ranging from 67 to 164 nm in radius, by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Table 1).
Both Rho-MatB and the unlabeled protein in the absence of MgATP displayed single, broad peaks with molar mass ranging from ∼60 to 80 kDa, suggesting that there was equilibrium between different species, mainly monomer (58 kDa) possibly with some dimer.
The molar mass distributions of various polyvinylalcohol (PVA) samples having molar masses ranging from 14 to 610 kg mol−1 have been determined by size exclusion chromatography (s.e.c).e.c
First, microwave (MW -assisted alcoholysis in the presence of ethylene glycol provides a rapid and straightforward MW -assistedngineering PHBHV-diol, with molalcoholysisanging from 700 the4100 g mol−1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com