Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
All experimental groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the final mesial root length of the upper right first molar compared to the untouched upper left first molar.
The linear measurement of the maximum mesial root length reveals significant root shortening of the experimental right first molar compared to the untouched left first molar for all experimental groups (Figure 6).
Volumetric measurement of the total root structure and the mesial root separately reveals a significant reduction in the root volume of the replanted upper right first molar compared to the untouched upper left first molar (Figure 7).
Volumetric assessment reveals a reduction in the tissue and bone volume in the inter-radicular region of the upper right first molar compared to the untouched upper left first molar (Figure 8).
We thus looked for a factor that may drive a faster evolution of the upper molar compared to the lower molar.
This evidences a lower canalisation of the third molar compared to the first teeth of the molar row, a result repeatedly found in rodents, arvicolines [37] as well as murines [4], and up to large mammals [38].
Similar(54)
The results demonstrated that the SiO2@APTES-GO electrode material led to enhanced dengue RNA detection sensitivity with selectivity and detection limit (1 femto-Molar), compared to both APTES-GO and APTES-SiO2.
However, vascularisation was reduced in all replanted molars compared to the control molars.
Smith [21] observed that the distal aspect of the mandibular second molars overerupted significantly in subjects orthodontically treated with extraction of maxillary second molars compared to nonextraction controls.
A distributed network of brain regions demonstrated significant increases in rCBF relating to pain following extraction of left and right third molars, compared to pain-free pre-surgical periods in the same subjects.
Mean differences for filled are small, being largest for lower molars compared to lower anterior teeth.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com