Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
[ScienceDaily] A controversial experimental field of genetically modified wheat is vandalized in Hertfordshire in England.
The North Dakota bill, which would impose a two-year moratorium on growing genetically modified wheat, is one of more than 40 state bills introduced this year.
To the biotech industry and major producers, the issue is simple: genetically modified corn is just corn, genetically modified wheat is just wheat and there is no scientific reason to differentiate.
The North Dakota bill, which would impose a two-year moratorium on growing genetically modified wheat, is one of more than 40 state bills introduced this year that would regulate biotech crops or the labeling of foods made using genetic engineering.
This is where genetically modified wheat is being grown, part of an experiment to see if the plants can repel a common pest, aphids, without having to resort to insecticide.
Similar(55)
Demonstrators in Britain are threatening to destroy some genetically modified wheat being grown in a research trial near London.
A Tesco spokeswoman said that the warning on about genetically modified wheat was "only precautionary; it doesn't say the product does contain such wheat".
The labels, posted on the product's own Facebook page and picked up by a food blogger, set off a buzz among consumers overseas and in the United States around the same time last week that modified wheat was found in a field in Oregon.
Anti-GM protestors have sabotaged crop trials in Britain in recent years by digging up fields, but a peaceful demonstration was held in May at the Rothamsted Research Institute in Hertfordshire, where genetically-modified wheat is being grown.
Both crude wheat straw and modified wheat straw were used in this study.
It showed that cellulase produced from the dilute acid-modified wheat straw is significantly different from the non-treated and acid soaking-modified wheat straw.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com