Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
If we had faster process chip, we could modified our algorithm to add more filters, perform Fourier transform, or floating point arithmetic in order to improve our results.
We therefore modified our algorithm to address this issue while maintaining our simple hypothesis testing approach and the principled comparison with the empirical distribution.
We modified our algorithm in such a way that genes were considered to be expressed, if a transcript is either present during the time point of interest or during a time span of approximately 12 hours prior to this time point (concerns 12 preceding samples of Bozdech data set and 2 preceding samples of Le Roch data set).
To accommodate the lack of matched normals in this dataset, we modified our algorithm to calculate the depth ratio and identify the heterozygous positions from two different sources: we used the near-diploid hematopoietic cell line SR as the normal genome for depth ratio calculation, and the selected cell line itself to determine heterozygous positions.
Similar(56)
In order to neglect the NU, we modified our algorithms to be independent from the noise variance.
We modify our algorithm in order to overcome the mentioned drawback.
To reduce the occurrence of this event, we modify our algorithm by requesting each player not to update its transmit power at every step of the game with a probability λ ∈ [0, 1].
In the future, we should consider the role that these small commands play in the Fujisaki model, and eventually modify our algorithm to suppress accent commands that are modeling micro-prosody.
We assume that both types of deletion data, as well as perturbation data, are available, although it is trivial to modify our algorithm by simply removing the corresponding subroutines if any type of data is missing.
By analyzing the other data as well as modifying our algorithm, we can refine our results.
Note, however, that the experienced reader can modify our algorithm easily to include these more sophisticated corrections.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com